Comments on: Christianity, Paganism And 12 Guys Who Loved to Fish http://metaphysicalsf.com/2010/02/02/christianity-paganism-and-12-guys-who-loved-to-fish/ The Speculative Fiction of John C. A. Manley: Where Spirituality, Science and Imagination Become One Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:33:21 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: breian http://metaphysicalsf.com/2010/02/02/christianity-paganism-and-12-guys-who-loved-to-fish/comment-page-1/#comment-21491 breian Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:33:21 +0000 http://metaphysicalsf.com/?p=533#comment-21491 "So it doesn’t mean, as the Zeitgeist Movement suggests, that Divine Incarnations were merely a man-made portrayal of natural phenomena." Man is very creative in nature (psychology). We can find abstract things and relate it to what ever tickles our fancy. Constructing somewhat meaningful associations with abstract things is very subjective. And we are capable of that. "I’d say that only proves that the Macrocosmic Power and Intelligence which orbits the Earth around the sun was fully expressed in the microcosmos of Jesus’ life." The quoted statement is very subjective. It doesn't prove anything, but a loose confirmation that we are very creative in attaching meaning to what we desire. “So it doesn’t mean, as the Zeitgeist Movement suggests, that Divine Incarnations were merely a man-made portrayal of natural phenomena.”

Man is very creative in nature (psychology). We can find abstract things and relate it to what ever tickles our fancy.

Constructing somewhat meaningful associations with abstract things is very subjective. And we are capable of that.

“I’d say that only proves that the Macrocosmic Power and Intelligence which orbits the Earth around the sun was fully expressed in the microcosmos of Jesus’ life.”

The quoted statement is very subjective. It doesn’t prove anything, but a loose confirmation that we are very creative in attaching meaning to what we desire.

]]>